Talk:Cult of Truth

Canonicity of name

Is there an official source for this name (and Cult of Runes, for that matter), or is it, as I suspect, another piece of fanon bleeding over from the Redemption timeline? I can't see anywhere in the manuals, clue book or transcript that these groups are actually referred to by name. --Terilem (talk) 13:14, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Neither can I. It's a pretty cool name, but it looks like we shouldn't be using it. Having said that, should there even be so much focus on this unnamed institution as to have its own article? I think we should fold this article's material into The_Ancient_Liturgy_of_Truth. The Ultra-Mind (talk) 13:41, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

I gleaned what material I could from this article and put it in The_Ancient_Liturgy_of_Truth. I think we can delete this article now. The Ultra-Mind (talk) 15:06, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Oh, uh... looking at Dargoth, I see it mentioned in the U6 Project section. So the name does have a role, as long as it's labelled as U6 Project only, but the article doesn't have a great deal of substance to it, so I don't know if its name is enough to keep the article. The Ultra-Mind (talk) 19:22, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Ok, IMO it should be deleted. When it is, the redirect Alizarkanon should also be. The Ultra-Mind (talk) 18:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)