Talk:Axe

Redundancy

The focus of this article is already on two-handed axes, and the passage that was just added to Variants basically just repeats what's in the Description section with different wording. Does it really need to be there? --Terilem (talk) 00:06, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

I was working on making a seperated thread about the Two-Handed Axe, overhauling all about the Two handed one. That is because 1) there are seperated threads about the Two-handed Hammer and the Two-Handed Sword...yet not one about the axe. 2) It is only making a weapon template more difficult, because you have to Axe | Two-Handed Axe and we both know it does not look great. Edit: Is not it a bit weird that a thread about generally axes, is only about the two-handed version? If so. Why not changing its name into Two-Handed Axe?--Arthgon (talk) 06:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Yeah you're right, it is a bit confusing when there are several varieties of axe. "Two-Handed Axe" already exists as a redirect, so perhaps a good first step would be to shift this article's content over there. "Axe" should probably be a general overview or disambiguation page. --Terilem (talk) 07:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)