Talk:Mt. Drash: The Roguelike

Isn't this non-cononcial?

According to Canon#Non-canonical_material Mt Drash is non-cononical. I can understand why there'd be a single article explaining Mt Drash, so's to clear up confusion for some readers, but is there any reason to keep this article? AngusM 04:52, May 20, 2010 (UTC)

We may want to make it clearer near the top of the article that this is a fan work. But as long as it is clear I see no reason not to have an article on it. In our ancient and dusty Editable_Codex:Coverage page we do have "remakes" and "Ultima community in general...". This would fall into both groups. -- Fenyx4 05:10, May 20, 2010 (UTC)

We should keep this article, yes. DrashRL is fanmade, but so is Lazarus, The Dark Core, Exult, The U4 Flash version, etc. --Warder Dragon 14:31, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Definately. Fan works have every business being on here as long as they are presented as such. (Dungy 21:09, June 25, 2010 (UTC))

Ok, I think this is pretty clear consensus (among those who have something to say). I'll remove the banner. AngusM 03:34, August 15, 2010 (UTC)