Talk:History of Britannia

From Ultima Codex
Jump to: navigation, search

We should probably include a section on the events of Ultima IX, even though most of us probably hate it and consider it non-canon. JubalHarshaw 20:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok, maybe as an seperate section at the end? I will fix that up then.

Looks great, thanks! JubalHarshaw 20:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

"(Note that the following events are highly controversial and often ignored)" - does this really needs to be specified ? The controversial aspect of Ultima IX is mentioned on its page and alredy tends to be overplayed throughough the wiki - like it or not, it's still an official and canon part of the Britannian history so I don't think there is need for this precision considering the controversial nature is clearly listed elsewhere, or else we could start doing that for all the potentially controversial aspect (such as the Earth attack of Ultima II or Ultima Underworld I... which are sometime debatted in terme of canon) and that would be silly.

Just my two cents Sergorn 20:30, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Please, do remove this kind of notes whenever you find them. Everybody agrees they don't belong in the wiki. They are just leftovers from times when the content was more opinionated.--Sega381 03:56, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Ancient Ones?[edit]

Just wondering if this actually canon. On the other hand, there's a great possibility that I've forgotten this piece of information that mentions them.