Forum:Spell article's name and categorization

Ok, so, according to Forum:Spell infobox, we've started working on the infoboxes for the spells. At least for now, it has been decided to group all equivalent spells from different games in a single article, with the infobox describing the specifics of each spell.

However, there's a couple of questions that arise from this:
 * How to call the article? As spells change name between game, we have, for example, Awaken All and Mass Awake, which are grouped together in the same article. But the article can have only one name. Some ideas for this:
 * Use the name of the spell from the newest/latest game. This would coincide with the infobox as it is now, which shows the information for the spell in the last game first. However, the name of a spell in the latest game may not be the most "popular" one.
 * Use the name of the spell from the first game it appeared.
 * Use the name more often repeated between games, if there is a repeated name. However, if there is not, we would have to go with one of other the alternatives.
 * Use the most "popular" name. This is highly subjective, and though we could reach consensus, it could become a pain.


 * Which spell name to use in the categories? We will be creating redirects for all the spell names which are not used as the main article's name. So where to add the categories?
 * Right now, the infobox is automatically adding them to the main article. Which means that, for example, Mass Charm will be categorized under "Ultima IV Spells", when in reality, Jinx is the name of the spell in U4. But at least the U4 infobox and the category are in the same article.
 * We could add the category to each redirect article. In the case above, we could somehow remove the "Ultima IV Spells" cat from the Mass Charm main article, and add it to the Jinx redirect article. But when looking at the main article, the infobox will show "Ultima IV" and its details (among the rest of the games), but below it won't appear the Ultima IV Spells category, which could lead to confusion and to people re-adding the category to the main article as well.

Opinions?--Sega381 08:25, 2 March 2011 (PST)