Forum:Atarka

So, I was most of the way through adding NPC Infoboxes to UW2 NPCs before I even realized Atarka was fanon. It seems really odd that Killorn Keep is a subsection of Atarka when, as fanon, it seems like it should be merely a note in Killorn Keep's article. This would require a lot of following cleanup of the UW2 pages as many of them reference Atarka even the Template:BRJewel Worlds has it. -- Fenyx4 17:34, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Yes. SoL's writing is excellent, it really is, but it's still fanon. If we want to play by our own rules, those references need to go, but we could still make note of it in Trivia sections or whatnot. How should we refer to the world Killorn Keep is in though? --Warder Dragon 20:31, June 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Maybe simply as Killron Keep's world? It's not that pretty, but I'm not sure a better term may come up...--Sega381 05:14, June 12, 2010 (UTC)