Talk:Shroud of the Avatar

Why is this here?
Sorry to be the one to say this... but why is this here? As much as I'm looking forward to SotA, it isn't an Ultima game. If we are going to include spiritual successors, where is the Arx Fatalis page? If its because its a Lord British game, where is Tabula Rasa?

Just to be objective, I'm not adverse to having information from this page somewhere on the wiki, but it feels like it should be on Richard Garriott's biography page, not as its own topic. That page should probably also have information added about Destination Games and Portalarium (with redirects added). --Browncoat Jayson 12:48, 9 March 2013 (PST)


 * I've also been debating this question. I think it really depends on how explicitly this game is supposed to be connected to the Ultima series. Arx Fatalis and Tabula Rasa both inhabit their own distinct universes, but Shroud of the Avatar blurs that line with details like the map essentially being U3-era Sosaria, as well as the title itself. We have to wonder, are those just a nod to the fans or actually intended as a continuation of the Ultima fiction as much as possible without violating copyright? I don't think we really know for sure yet, but if it's the latter, I'd say the game deserves to be here; it's certainly no more extraneous than having an article for Escape from Mt. Drash. --Terilem 03:16, 10 March 2013 (PDT)
 * I agree. If anything should go it's Mt. Drash, but I think it should stay, because it sets the record straight. Same goes for this article, which has Ultima references in its name. So even if it becomes as irrelevant as Mt. Drash, it's still relevant to the wiki. The Ultra-Mind 16:10, 10 March 2013 (PDT)
 * Speaking of Mt. Drash on one of the pictures of the maps concept art it has 'Mt. Drash' scribbled in the margin.
 * Right now there are too many Ultima-esque things for us to not have it. Map looks like U3 Sosaria, 'Avatar' in the title, 'Virtues' in the title, moongate-like things in the concept art. If later on it the difference becomes more vast then we can look at removing it.
 * What one could argue for is that a full new game may require its own wiki for all the detailed information... -- Fenyx4 20:08, 10 March 2013 (PDT)
 * And should it come to that, I think it would be best it to have created here (Ultimacodex) as its own section, before it pops up in a wikia site and starts competing us. --Time Lord 23:01, 10 March 2013 (PDT)

The more I think about this, the more I warm up to the idea that this might be something we should include in canon and coverage sometime. The fact that EA owns the property rights, and licenses them, means only that. Not being a lawyer, just how much weight should that carry w/me? It seems that the very mind which created the undisputed canonical material is also applying the same creativity to this project and it's clearly not a Wing Commander or Autoduel, and, for no reasons other than legal ones, is not an explicit Ultima. Isn't that all that really matters?

Once it comes out, I think we should have a precedent-setting debate on what role this is going to have in the Ultima universe, as we see it. The Ultra-Mind (talk) 16:10, 16 May 2013 (UTC)